Find The Best Answer

Five principles to add to your strength training program to get that esponse are:

1) Programming: When you set out to achieve something you usually plan for it, correct? If you wanted to be successful with it you would. If your goal or desire is to drop some body fat, you must plan or program for it. Know what each workout is going to consist of. Know what exercises you're going to do, how many sets, how many reps and how long the rest period is going to be. Your workouts should look like those of any successful fat burning program. Just following any program from some newsstand magazine may not get you the results that you're searching for.

2) Use Compound Movements: If you're spending a good portion of your time doing triceps pressdowns or standing calf raises as part of a fat loss program, you're wasting your time. The goals of any fat loss program should be to elevate your metabolism during and post workout. Part of achieving this rise in metabolism is performing exercises that are demanding and place stress on more than one muscle group at a time. Muscle is a metabolically active tissue. So if more can be recruited at one time a spike in metabolism will occur. The bulk of your workouts should be made of compound movements such as: chin ups, incline presses, push ups, deadlifts, squats and lunges. The use of exercises such as pressdowns or calf raises should be used in order to bring up lagging body parts, not to burn fat.

3) Use Short Rest Periods: Successful fat loss programs are based on having short rest intervals between exercises. These short rest intervals have been shown to induce higher levels of blood lactate. In turn, higher levels of blood lactate result in higher levels of circulating growth hormone, your body's number one natural fat burner. The suggested amount of rest between exercises will depend upon the exact program and which exercises are being used. But I would suggest rest intervals of no longer than 90sec. For less demanding exercises, rest intervals can even be cut to 30 seconds or so. This type of training is unlike relative or maximal strength training where rest intervals may last anywhere from 3-5 minutes to allow for recovery of your your central nervous system. Remember, the goal if you're reading this is fat loss. So keep the rest intervals short

4) Intensity: If you want to burn some fat you're going to have to work at. Lifting the cute, pink dumbbells by hardly exerting any effort is not going to get it done for you. Walking on the treadmill at 3mph while reading the latest issue of People magazine is not going to get it done for you. Just because you're moving, it does not mean you're shedding body fat. In order to shed body fat, you must work at a higher intensity level. Working at higher intensity levels will result in an accumulation of blood lactate which, as mentioned before, will stoke the fat burning process

5) Use an alternating set scheme: Use supersets, compound sets or tri-sets as part of your strength training program. One, they are much more efficient for getting more work done in a certain amount of time. Two, using some type of alternating set type of programming will induce higher levels of blood lactate leading to a greater fat burning response. A typical superset made up of two exercises may look like:

A1) Chin Up, rest for 60seconds and then move to A2.

A2) Bulgarian Squat, rest for seconds and go back to A1.

Keep repeating this sequence until the desired number of sets and reps is completed

So there you have it. Five ways to turn your strength training program into a fat loss program.

The basis for claim drafting is found in the statute, namely 35 USC section 112. This section of the statute states that the specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter for which the applicant regards as his invention.

However, various rules and practices have developed in order to fulfill the mandate of particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter. In general, this means that the claims must define the invention which means the claimed subject matter. Thus, there must be sufficient detail that the patent examiner and subsequently the world of perspective infringers can understand what the claimed subject matter is.

A first rule is that omnibus or formal claims are not permitted in utility patents. For example claims which recite 'my invention substantially as shown and described' or 'any and all features of novelty described' are not permitted in the United States. These types of claims if allowed, would allow too much uncertainty as to the patent coverage. The inventor must define the patent coverage as precisely as circumstances permit.

The reason for demanding certainty in patent coverage is that the world of potential infringers should have a clear understanding of the patent coverage. If uncertainty were permitted in patent coverage, the world of potential infringers would have to guess the extent of the patent coverage that is covered by a particular patent. This is the basis for the duty to define the area to be covered by the patent claims as precisely as circumstances permit.

An analogy can be made with the description of the boundaries for a plot of land. The patent claim drafter must stakeout the precise boundaries of the claim in a manner that is similar to the description for the boundaries for a plot of land.

This concept is extremely useful for the potential infringers but may disadvantage the patentee because the true extent of the usefulness of the patent may not be evident until years in the future. The true extent may extend beyond the description found in the current specification and may not be captured by the literal boundaries that the patentee has set forth in his claims. This conflict is inherent between the potential infringers and the patentee.

Another statue which affects the permitted claim language is 35 USC section 101 which sets out four main categories or pigeonholes of technical subject matter for which utility patents can be granted. The statutory classes are process, machine, manufacture or composition of matter.

Such things as mathematical formulas, bookkeeping systems and articles formed in nature have been held to be unpatentable because they are not found to be within the classes set up by Congress.

A claim regardless how artfully drafted must define the invention in such a way that it fits into one of the statutory classes. A failure to fit into the statutory class may result in a failure of the claim to be patentable.

Ornamental designs and certain agricultural plants are separate statutory classes with different rules.

This does not mean that these things cannot be part of a patent application. These things can be combined with the permitted statutory classes. For example, a device could be controlled by a computer which executes a mathematical formula. The mathematical formula per se cannot be claimed as the patentee's invention. However, the device which operates in accordance with the mathematical formula can be a proper object for claimed subject matter.